Legal Opinion

State v. Belfry

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1984No. C6-84-156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Belfry appeals his jury conviction of theft by swindle of $2,500 or more. The evidence of criminal intent sustained the verdict. Belfry waived any objection to aggregation of eight offenses into one complaint; the court did not err by failing to strike certain offenses from the complaint. We affirm.

FACTS

Belfry operated a business called Delta Associates. Delta sold reconditioned automobiles to its customers. Customers would request a particular car which was paid for in advance. Four to eight weeks later the automobile was to be delivered. A provision in the sales contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. ShoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. BelfryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. SayboltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. RachuyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. LORSUNGCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API