Schlens v. Poe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Three appeals in one record from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
The present appeal brings to the attention of this Court fc-r the fifth time the contract entered into some twelve years ago between the United ‘Surety Company of the City of Baltimore and the Munich Insurance Company.
The previous cases will be found reported respectively in 113 Md. 200; 121 Md. 479; 126 Md. 520 and 128 Md. 352. The main facts in this litigation are fully set out in 121 Md. 479, and 128 Md. 352, and it would serve no useful purpose to repeat them again.
It should he stated in limine that no new question of law is now presented, or one which has not already been considered and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Poe v. Munich Re-Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Schlens v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Poe v. Munich Reinsurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1921