Poe v. Munich Reinsurance Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
In Equity. Suit by Edwin W. Poe and others, as receivers of the United Surety Company, against the Munich Reinsurance Company, a corporation, and Francis P. Garvan, Alien Property Custodian. Decree rendered for an accounting.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs are the receivers of the United Surety Company, a Maryland corporation. They and it will both be referred to as the United, unless there is occasion to distinguish between them. The principal defendant is the Munich Reinsurance *950Company, a corporation of Bavaria. The Alien Property Custodian, who holds its American property, does not raise any defense peculiar to himself, and may in this discussion be ignored.
The United was chartered in 1906. Within a few months after its organization, it concluded with the Munich a participation agreement, upon which this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Poe v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Preston v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Poe v. Munich Re-Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hicks v. PoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Miller v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923