Legal Opinion

Schlens v. Poe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Cross-appeals in one record from the Circuit Court of Baltimore. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

"When the conceded and uncontradicted facts are extracted from the mass of testimony contained in the record before us, the questions before the Court present little difficulty. An outline of these facts will show the precise issues raised by the pleadings and indicate the principles of law which must be applied to the ease.

The Ibaited Surety Company was incorporated by Chapter 479 of the laws of 1902, and organized and began busines’s about January, 1905. It was authorized by its charter to sell surety and casualty bonds in the State of Maryland and elsewhere. It extended its business to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  2. Smith v. Washington Gaslight Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davison Chemical Co. v. Baugh Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  2. Poe v. Munich Reinsurance Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1921
  3. Schlens v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Caroline Mills v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Stovall v. SAMUELS GLASS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API