Legal Opinion

Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 1910PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Hicuisler, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree which dismissed the hill of complaint of the Munich Re-Insurance Company filed against the United Surety Company, decreed that the defendant was entitled to cross-relief as prayed in its answer, and referred the cause to the auditor to ascertain and report the amount, if any, due by the plaintiff to the defendant under what is called a “participation contract.” The bill charges that the Munich Company was induced to enter into and execute that contract with "the Surety Company through false and fraudulent representations of material facts on the part of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Emma Silver Mining Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
  2. Cole v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Bach v. . TuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Franklin Fire Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Basshor v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Flanagan v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Poe v. Munich Re-Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. Home for Incurables v. BruffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. Telma v. GingellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API