Legal Opinion

Eddie Wooten v. McDonald Transit Assoc, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 10, 2015No. 13-11035PublishedCited by 490 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:

Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, see Internal Operating Procedure accompanying 5th Cir. R. 35, the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED.

We previously issued an opinion assessing whether evidence adduced at a default-judgment “prove-úp” hearing can cure a facially deficient complaint, a question this Court left open forty years ago in Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Houston National Bank, 515 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir.1975). 1 See Wooten v. McDonald Transit Assocs., Inc., 775 F.3d 689 (5th Cir.2015). Upon reconsideration,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by490 opinions

  1. J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Morelia Mexican Restaurant, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Louis Koerner, Jr. v. Vigilant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Escalante v. LidgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  4. Salim Sindhi v. Kunal RainaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Norsworthy v. Houston Indep Sch DistCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

485 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API