Legal Opinion

Chavers v. Epsco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 2003No. 02-866PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Appellants Reggie Chavers and Mark Chavers appeal a judgment entered against them by the Craighead County Circuit Court. Reggie and Mark argue that the trial court erred in holding them liable for a company debt based upon partnership by estoppel because the proof was vague and insufficient and there was no detrimental reliance on the part of a creditor. We hold that the trial court was not clearly erroneous in finding liability based upon partnership by estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm.

Gary Chavers operated Chavers Welding and Construction (“CWC”), a construction and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Myrick v. MyrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Sharp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Lee v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Pyle v. SayersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Sturdivant v. SturdivantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Perkins v. Cedar Mountain Sewer Improvement District No. 43Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API