Pyle v. Sayers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
This case involves a will contest, with issues concerning undue influence and mental capacity. Appellant Michael Pyle appeals the order of the Union County Probate Court, finding that the will of Mabel Hammond was valid. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the probate court on December 20, 2000. Pyle v. Sayers, 72 Ark. App. 207, 34 S.W.3d 786 (2000). This Court subsequently accepted appellant’s petition for review; hence, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(e)(ii). We, likewise, affirm the decision of the probate court.
Mabel…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brunson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Mullinax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Greenwood v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- McDaniel ad. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Lee v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Chavers v. Epsco, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Anderson v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Estate of Garrett v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.