Legal Opinion

Cold Metal Process Co. v. Aluminum Co. of America

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 19, 1947No. Misc. Civil Action No. 6150-93; Civil Action No. 6797PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

In each of these two cases there is before this Court a motion for an order to compel answers to certain questions propounded to one Dr. Martin J. Buerger at a taking of his deposition. Both motions pertain to the same questions. In the case of Union National Bank of Youngstown, Ohio, v. Thompson Wire Company, the original action is pending in the District of Massachusetts; the case of Cold Metal Process Company v. Aluminum Company of America is pending in the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northern Division. To simplify matters, I will deal in this opinion only with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
  5. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. Haberman Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Stanley Works v. Haeger Potteries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
  3. United States v. 6.82 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1955
  4. Ford Motor Company v. HaveeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Maginnis v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API