Legal Opinion
United States v. Cold Metal Process Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 11, 1945No. 21910PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
This action was filed by the United States of America as plaintiff on July 27, 1943, praying cancellation of United States .Letters Patent No. 1,744,016 (hereinafter referred to as ’016) and Patent No. 1,779,-195 (hereinafter referred to as T95) owned by the defendant The Cold Metal Process ■Company (hereinafter referred to as Cold Metal) assignee of the defendant Abram P. Steckel, for fraud upon the Commissioner of Patents in the procurement thereof, or, in the alternative, for mutual mistake of fact upon the part of the applicant and-the Commissioner.
The complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Norton Company, Appellant-Cross v. Carborundum Company, Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Marks v. Polaroid CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.