Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. Haberman Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The question presented upon this application is whether a certain letter written by counsel for the complainants to Mr. Banks, a witness called on behalf of the complainants, which letter is entirely concerned with the matters in *564controversy in this suit, is privileged. That communications between client and counsel, and between counsel and associate counsel, are privileged, is, of course, undisputed. This rule is founded upon a public policy, which undertakes to secure the freest and fullest statement of a party’s case to the lawyer whom he retained to prosecute or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Hartness v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. 62.96247 Acres of LandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.