Legal Opinion

Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. Haberman Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 6, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The question presented upon this application is whether a certain letter written by counsel for the complainants to Mr. Banks, a witness called on behalf of the complainants, which letter is entirely concerned with the matters in *564controversy in this suit, is privileged. That communications between client and counsel, and between counsel and associate counsel, are privileged, is, of course, undisputed. This rule is founded upon a public policy, which undertakes to secure the freest and fullest statement of a party’s case to the lawyer whom he retained to prosecute or…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Hartness v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. 62.96247 Acres of LandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Cold Metal Process Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API