Legal Opinion
Stanley Works v. Haeger Potteries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 16, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 64 C 124PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
1) Motion of plaintiff to amend Summons and Complaint to add parties defendant.
2) Plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s interrogatories.
1) This consolidated cause arises out of an alleged infringement of plaintiff’s patent covering a skin-packaging technique. Plaintiff seeks at this time to amend the summons and complaint in this action by adding the Dow Chemical Co. and the Continental Can Company as parties defendant.
As grounds therefor, plaintiff asserts that the potential defendants have been guilty of contributory infringement of plaintiff’s patent, and have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Meyercheck v. GivensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Ellis-Foster Company v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
- Harman v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1960
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.