Legal Opinion

Carolina v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1984No. 8310SC372PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Guilt Phase

Defendant contends the court erred in failing to summarize any of his evidence or contentions in its instructions while fully summarizing the State’s evidence and contentions. He did not present evidence, but relies on evidence allegedly favorable to him elicited on cross-examination.

Defendant concedes that he did not object at trial, and that N.C. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) thus precludes assigning this failure as error on appeal. He argues, however, that failure to allow him the opportunity to object out of the hearing of the jury obviates the Rule 10(b)(2) requirement.

Th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. AbdullahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. PenderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API