Legal Opinion

Ephraim Theatre Company v. Hawk

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1958No. 8606PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendants seek reversal of a judgment for rental of plaintiff’s theater building at $125 per month for a period of 10 months. Their attack on the judgment is grounded on their contention that any obligation to pay rent was contingent, to be paid only out of income from the theater as provided in the terms of a written contract; whereas the trial court held the requirement for the payment of rent as unconditional, which holding we reverse.

Plaintiff corporation owned tlje Ephraim Theatre in Ephraim, Utah. On April 30, 1946, the parties entered into a contract for a joint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. RICHLANDS IRR. CO. v. WESTVIEW IRR. CO. Et Al.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Johnson v. GeddesUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Murphy v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Paggi v. SklirisUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Martin v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API