Legal Opinion
Consolidated Lumber Co. v. Mercury Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1933No. 29,409PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant Mercury Insurance Company appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The action is to reform and recover upon a fire insurance policy.
In June, 1931, plaintiff was under a contract furnishing the lalsor and material- and constructing a building for Eude Kreisel upon land owned by him near Balsam Lake, Wisconsin, to be used for a night club. The work was to be completed by July 4, 1931.
Frank Steinmetz conducted a local insurance agency at Frederic, Wisconsin. He lived there and was a duly appointed agent of the appellant, as required by Wisconsin…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Duffie v. Bankers' Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- White v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Journal Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. FriedleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Preferred Acc. Insurance v. OnaliDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- Keetley v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
- Pellicano v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941