Legal Opinion
Bartley v. BTL Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 20, 1992No. CX-92-1100PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Gerald Bartley contends the trial court erred by awarding him a 6 percent interest rate as provided in Minn.Stat. § 334.01, subd. 2 (1990), rather than a 12 percent rate as provided for in a promissory note. Bartley also argues the trial court erred by not awarding him attorney fees. Respondent guarantors argue the guarantees they signed do not comply with the statute of frauds, Minn.Stat. § 513.01(2) (1990), and therefore are not enforceable. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
In 1982 appellant Gerald Bartley sold the assets and shares of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Shakopee Sports Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dewey v. Henry's Drive-Ins of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- J. J. Brooksbank Co. v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Community Finance Group, Inc. v. Fields (In Re Fields)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2011