J. J. Brooksbank Co. v. American Motors Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Consolidated appeals from Hennepin County Municipal Court orders denying plaintiff a new trial after a directed verdict for defendants and dismissing a second action upon the ground that it was barred by the directed verdict in the previous action.
The determinative issue presented is whether the statute of frauds bars plaintiff’s alleged cause of action for breach of an oral contract claimed to require defendants to repurchase or secure a dealer to repurchase automobiles sold to plaintiff pursuant to such promise. We conclude that plaintiff’s action is not barred and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Cole v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Burkel v. Pro-Vid-All Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Riley v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rockney v. Pako Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- General Marketing Services, Inc. v. American Motorsports, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Mitchell Feed & Seed, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Allison v. Best Recycling & Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Bartley v. BTL Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.