Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Midwest Pipe & Supply Co. v. Haid

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 7, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenwood, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus wherein relators seek to compel the St. Louis Court of Appeals to set aside its order dismissing the appeal in the case of Lena Bender, respondent, v. Midwest Pipe & Supply Company and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, appellants, and to compel said court to hear said ease and to render a decision therein on the merits.

Our alternative writ was issued, and respondents filed a demurrer to relator’s petition, the ground of the demurrer being that the facts stated in the petition are not sufficient to authorize the issuance of a writ of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Mountain Grove Bank v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Dougherty v. Manhattan Rubber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. City of Macon v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Florida Forest & Park Service v. Eston StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Koebel Ex Rel. Koebel v. Tieman Coal & Material Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Lambert v. PadbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API