Legal Opinion

Florida Forest & Park Service v. Eston Strickland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 19, 1944PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, J.:

Eston Strickland was employed by Florida Forest & Park Service as a fire-tower watchman. While on the job he became embroiled in an argument with one Slaughter, which culminated in a gun battle between the parties. In the exchange of shots which ensued, Slaughter was killed and Strickland was severely wounded. Strickland filed a claim for compensation under the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Law for the injuries sustained. The claim was controverted, the employer and its insurance carrier denying liability on the ground that the injury was occasioned by the wilful intention of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. South Atlantic Steamship Co. of Delaware v. TutsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Mountain Grove Bank v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Chamberlain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Richard S. Simpson v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API