Williams Mfg. Co. v. Prock
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
When sued upon 78 notes, payable weekly, aggregating $23,479.80, the defendant interposed the defense that the consideration of the notes was the purchase of pin ball and baseball game machines which were gambling devices and therefore illegal under the law of Texas. After securing admissions from the plaintiff, and upon these, the pleadings, and the defendant’s uncontroverted affidavit, the defendant moved that the trial Court enter summary judgment in his behalf, his motion was granted, and plaintiff-appellant assigns error.
' The undisputed facts, properly established…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Moore v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. ProckDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tooley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1955
- Albert v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Flener v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Flener v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.