Williams Mfg. Co. v. Prock
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff seeks judgment for $23,479.80, evidenced hy a promissory note, which note, the defendant shows by reason of the discoveries, pleadings and decisions, as well as by the petition, and concededly at this argument, was given for gambling devices and is, therefore, without -legal consideration.
The machines which the plaintiff sold to the defendant were what may be termed, pin-ball machines, baseball-game machines, or, marble machines. It seems that the player of either of the machines, so sold, placed a coin in the machine and then if the metal ball which was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Broaddus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. ProckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- National Dairy Products Corp. v. Gleeson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1958
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. ProckCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950