Legal Opinion

Tooley v. United States

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 27, 1955No. 1057PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

This matter came on for a two day trial, without a jury, on the 1st day of December, 1954.

Nature of The Case

Jean Tooley, a citizen of the United States, residing at Las Vegas, Nevada, on the 18th day of July, 1952, paid the sum of $250 to the Collector of Internal Revenue, District of Nevada, as a special tax levied under the provisions of Title 26 U.S.C. § 3267(a) (2), upon a coin operated machine or device known as the “Sidebottom Super Crane Machine.” Thereafter and on August 4, 1952, plaintiff filed a claim with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue demanding refund of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Hunter v. Mayor & Council of the Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Chambers v. BachtelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. 24 Digger Merchandising MacHines Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Morris L. Johnson v. Robert L. Phinney, Director of Internal Revenue of United States of America for Southern District of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boies v. BartellArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Twenty-Eight "Mighty Payloader" Coin-Operated Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. 20 "Dealer's Choice" Machines & Coin Contents of $3.50Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. 20 "Dealer's Choice" Machines & Coin Contents of $3.50District Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API