Legal Opinion

Barraza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1990No. 892-87PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury found appellant, Alodio Barraza, Jr., guilty of driving while intoxicated. The trial court placed him on probation for two years and assessed a fine of $360.00. He appealed to the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals asserting the trial court had erred in refusing to grant his motion to quash the information because it failed to allege the manner of intoxication. The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to quash, Barraza v. State, 733 S.W.2d 379, 382 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987), and we granted…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Barraza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  3. Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. State v. WinskeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

4Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  2. Gajewski v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. State v. Arriaga, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. Fox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API