Legal Opinion

Solis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1990No. 117-88PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and punishment was as sessed by a jury at two years probation and a $300 fine. V.A.T.S. Art. 6701Z-l(b). Holding that the trial judge erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash, the San Antonio Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction. Solis v. State, 742 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1987). We granted the State’s petitions for discretionary review in order to determine whether a charging instrument alleging driving while intoxicated by means of introduction…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. State v. BarbernellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. State v. ZunigaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API