Barraza v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
Appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of Driving While Intoxicated. The court placed appellant on probation for two years and assessed a fine of $360.00. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
By his first point of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove that he was the man who allegedly committed the offense. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court looks at all the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict or judgment and determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Gajewski v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- State v. Arriaga, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Fox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.