State v. Winskey
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The trial court granted Winskey’s motion to quash the information and dismissed the case. The State appealed under Article 44.01, V.A.C.C.P. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Winskey, 770 S.W.2d 942 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1989). We granted the County Attorney’s and the State Prosecuting Attorney’s petitions for discretionary review to determine whether an information which charges driving while intoxicated, alleging both theories of intoxication in the disjunctive, is subject to a motion to quash. We will reverse the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Geter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CarterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Karnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Barraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Hartis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.