Legal Opinion

James v. Spear

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1959No. Civ. 9342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant brought this action to recover damages from defendant and respondent (a physician practicing his specialty in eye, ear, nose and throat conditions) for alleged negligence resulting in injury to appellant’s right eye. Respondent was granted a nonsuit and the appeal is from the judgment following the order.

Appellant’s evidence discloses the following: Respondent undertook to treat a stopped tear duct, leading from appellant’s right eye so as to permit the duct to perform its function of draining lachrymal fluid from the eye. Appellant visited respondent 13 times for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wolfsmith v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Burns v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Karstensen v. Western Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramos Orengo v. Gobierno de la Capital de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. Emmanuelli Vda. de Torres v. WombleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971
  3. Charlton v. Montefiore HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ramos Orengo v. Government of the Capital of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API