Andrew Rowland, a Minor by His Guardian Lewis Rowland v. Curtis Tarr, National Director of Selective Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The question in this appeal from the dismissal of a complaint requesting convocation of a three-judge statutory court to test the constitutionality of the Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C. App. § 451, et seq., is whether the district court erred in finding lack of jurisdiction.
The trial court 341 F.Supp. 339, found that some of the constitutional issues presented by appellants had already been authoritatively adjudicated adversely to the appellants’ contentions thereby obviating the necessity of additional litigation. In other respects, the court found the claims…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shade v. Commonwealth of Pa., Dept. of Transp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Goldberg v. RostkerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Goldberg v. TarrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.