Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Rostker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 6, 1980No. Civ. A. 71-1480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAHN, District Judge.
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Before this three-judge court is the issue of the constitutionality of the selective service registration of males only, as provided for in the Military Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.App. § 451 et seq. (hereafter MSSA). In preliminary proceedings we set forth the history of this case, Goldberg v. Tarr,F.Supp.-, No. 71-1480 (E.D.Pa. Feb. 19, 1980). 1 We will not repeat it here. In that opinion we identified plaintiffs’ constitutional argument as follows:
[Tjheir rights to equal protection of the law, as that concept is included in the due…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Katcoff v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Kyle-Labell v. Selective Serv. Sys.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schwartz v. BrodskyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.