Legal Opinion
Eaton Corporation v. Appliance Valves Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 30, 1986No. 85-2406PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
790 F.2d 874
54 USLW 2627, 229 U.S.P.Q. 668
EATON CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
APPLIANCE VALVES CORPORATION, Thomas R. Krzewina, William R.
Donahue, Jr., David F. Miller, and Design &
Manufacturing Corporation, Appellees.
Appeal No. 85-2406.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
April 30, 1986.
Christopher B. Fagan, Fay, Sharpe, Fagan, Minnich & McKee, Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellant.
David M. Mattingly, Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, Ind., Albert E. Strasser, Frost & Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Joseph T. Bumbleburg, Ball Eggleston Bumbleburg & McBride, Lafayette, Ind., argued,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Bandag, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant. v. Al Bolser's Tire Stores, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atd Corporation v. Lydall, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Donald D. Gronholz v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- A.H.J. Vink v. Hendrikus Johannes Schijf, Rolkan N v. And Contractual ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Atd Corporation v. Lydall, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re Mark A. Vaeck, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.