Legal Opinion
Atd Corporation v. Lydall, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 6, 1998No. 97-1308, 97-1356Published
1Opinion of the Court
159 F.3d 534
48 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321
ATD CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LYDALL, INC., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 97-1308, 97-1356.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1998.
Bruce T. Wieder, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P., Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Frederick G. Michaud, Jr., Eric H. Weisblatt, and Ronni S. Jillions.
Barry L. Grossman, Foley & Lardner, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. Of counsel on the brief was William P. Atkins, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, LLP.
Before RICH, NEWMAN, and CLEVENGER,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.