Legal Opinion
A.H.J. Vink v. Hendrikus Johannes Schijf, Rolkan N v. And Contractual Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 10, 1988No. 87-1350PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
A.H.J. Vink (Vink) appeals from the order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in favor of Hendrikus Johannes Schijf et al. (Schijf) dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand the case to the district court.
Background
U.S. Patent No. 4,315,345 (’345) originally issued to and was owned by appellee Hendrikus J. Schijf. After Schijf went bankrupt Vink acquired the patent by assignment from an assignee claiming title to the patent through the trustee in bankruptcy. The appellee, Contractual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Engage Learning, Inc. v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dennis N. Pixton v. B & B Plastics, Inc. (Doing Business as Gambler), Michael Surman, and Russell BringgerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Do-Well MacHine Shop, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Speedco, Incorporated v. Donald EstesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.