Legal Opinion
In Re Mark A. Vaeck, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntosh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 21, 1991No. 91-1120Published
1Opinion of the Court
947 F.2d 488
20 U.S.P.Q.2d 1438
In re Mark A. VAECK, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntosh.
No. 91-1120.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Oct. 21, 1991.
Ian C. McLeod, Ian C. McLeod, P.C., Okemos, Mich., argued for appellant.
Teddy S. Gron, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., of Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Fred E. McKelvey, Sol. and Richard E. Schafer, Associate Sol.
Before RICH, ARCHER, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
RICH, Circuit Judge.
1
This appeal is from the September 12, 1990 decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.