Schulte Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Two issues are pressed: [1] Does re manufacture of unusable oilfield pipe constitute “manufacturing” within the meaning of 68 O.S.Supp.1990 § 1352(H) and 68 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 1359(A) and (Q? 1 and if so, [2] Is the diesel fuel used for protestant’s forklifts consumed in the “manufacturing process” and hence exempt from sales tax? 2 We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
RDL Services, Inc. [RDL or taxpayer], appellant, is engaged in the business of (a) converting raw pipe (tubing and easing) into finished oilfield pipe, and (b) refurbishing used and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edward's Lessee v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1827
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.