Legal Opinion

Schulte Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1994No. 80215PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Two issues are pressed: [1] Does re manufacture of unusable oilfield pipe constitute “manufacturing” within the meaning of 68 O.S.Supp.1990 § 1352(H) and 68 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 1359(A) and (Q? 1 and if so, [2] Is the diesel fuel used for protestant’s forklifts consumed in the “manufacturing process” and hence exempt from sales tax? 2 We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

RDL Services, Inc. [RDL or taxpayer], appellant, is engaged in the business of (a) converting raw pipe (tubing and easing) into finished oilfield pipe, and (b) refurbishing used and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Edward's Lessee v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1827

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Estes v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API