Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1975No. 7521SC349PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Though defendant presents several assignments of error, the only one warranting express consideration is the assignment of error based on the admission of evidence of an offense which occurred more than seven months after the date of the offense with which defendant is charged in the case at bar.

“It is the general rule that in a prosecution for a particular crime, evidence in chief which shows that defendant has committed other distinct, independent offenses is not admissible. State v. Myers, 240 N.C. 462, 82 S.E. 2d 213; State v. McClain, 240 N.C. 171, 81 S.E. 2d 364. This rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. DancyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. WeldonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API