State v. Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEANCH, Justice.
Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in admitting into evidence statements allegedly made by defendant to Detective Eichard E. Washburn.
The test of admissibility of a confession is whether the statements made by the defendant were in fact voluntary and understandingly made. State v. Gray, 268 N.C. 69, 150 S.E. 2d 1; State v. Rogers, 233 N.C. 390, 64 S.E. 2d 572. In the case of State v. Fox, 277 N.C. 1, 175 S.E. 2d 561, Sharp, Justice, succinctly stated the procedure and rules concerning custodial confessions, as follows:
“ . . . When the State offers a confession in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- State v. FrankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.