Legal Opinion

State v. Weldon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 8310SC204Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in allowing testimony that police found heroin in or near her house on two other occasions. She alleges that the evidence was irrelevant, except to show her propensity to commit the offense of felonious possession of heroin. Under the general rule, evidence of other offenses, even those which are of the same nature as the one charged, is inadmissible to prove the commission of the particular crime charged. State v. McClain, 240 N.C. 171, 81 S.E. 2d 364 (1954). In drug cases, however, “evidence of other drug viola*378tions is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API