Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corp. v. Crosley Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1942No. 9096PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The bill of complaint charging infringement of MacDonald Patents, Nos. 1,913,604 and 2,022,514, owned by appellant, was dismissed in the district court on the ground that the patents were not infringed. Decision on the issue of the validity of the patent claims was pretermitted.
The patents, relating to vacuum tube radio receivers, describe a wave signaling system; and the invention, as defined by appellant, provides an antenna primary inductance suitable for connection to a capacity antenna, in which the inductance is of such value as to insure resonance of the antenna…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Stilz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Huszar v. Cincinnati Chemical Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Green v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.