Legal Opinion
Huszar v. Cincinnati Chemical Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1949No. 10675PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The controversy was begun by an action of the appellee for a declaratory judgment seeking to have its rights determined as against the appellant’s claims for infringement of three patents covering what is known as a rod mill. The appellant counterclaimed, seeking a declaration of validity for his patents, damages for past and restraint of future infringement. The patents are Huszar 2,367,585, ■ 2,393,245 and 2,394,453, granted respectively January 16, 1945, January 1, 1946 and February 4, 1946. All of them were granted upon divisional applications stemming from an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- John P. O'Brien v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval Holman, Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Square Deal Market Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.