Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
Certain of the claims of two patents in the shoe-making art were held below to be valid and infringed by a number of machines purchased abroad by the appellant and used by it in the United States. The appellant assails the decree in respect both to its adjudication of validity and infringement.
The patents in suit are McFeely, No. 1,-558,737, for a lasting machine, granted October 27, 1925, and Hoyt, No. 1,508,394, for a fastening inserting machine, granted September 16, 1924. Both inventions concern themselves with improvements in machines for lasting heel seats of shoes…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.