Signal Thread Company v. King
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Humphbeys
This case presents the question whether Signal Thread Company was doing business during the tax years involved “in Tennessee and elsewhere”, so as to entitle it to use the apportionment formula for excise and franchise tax set forth in T.C.A. secs. 67-2708 and 67-2914. *244The Chancellor found appellant was -not doing business elsewhere and dismissed its suit to recover the portion of these taxes appellant had claimed were due to business done elsewhere, and appellant has appealed assigning this ’ action as error.
The case was tried on a stipulation of fact which in pertinent part is as follows:
“V.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- John Ownbey Co. v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Guinness v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Narragansett Wire Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Navarre Corp. v. TidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Tidwell v. Gaines Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Howard Cotton Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.