Guinness v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.
This is an appeal from a decree holding that a pleasure yacht was exempt from taxation for the years 1940 to 1945, inclusive, and a cross-appeal from the decree holding that it was subject to tax for the year 1946.
Arthur Ernest Guinness is a subject of Great Britain, with his domicile in London, England. On September 3, 1937, he purchased the yacht “Fantome.” This vessel was used solely for pleasure cruising and has never been used for any other purpose. It is registered under the laws of Great Britain, with the home port in Southampton, England.
In February, 1939, the yacht left England for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morgan v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- North American Dredging Co. v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Yost v. Lake Erie Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Irving T. Bush, Et Ux. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Barker v. Inhabitants of FairhavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
3Cited by10 opinions
- Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co. v. State Department of Assessment & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Flight Options v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Flight Options, LLC v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Signal Thread Company v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Alaska Freight Lines, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.