Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1962PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

These two cases were consolidated and heard by the Chancellor and we shall render one opinion applicable to both cases. These suits were brought to recover certain taxes paid under protest, the taxpayers contending that they are not liable for Sales and Use Taxes under the Tennessee Retailers’ Tax Act as amended. The Chancellor held the appellants were not entitled to recover and dismissed the suits. Appeals have been perfected and five assignments of error are directed to the action of the Chancellor in his order of dismissal.

In the year 1958 Union Carbide Corporation, called Carbide in this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Thiokol Chemical Corporation v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Franklin Distributing Co. v. Crush International (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  5. Shelby County v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API