Legal Opinion

Navarre Corp. v. Tidwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This action was filed by appellant, The Navarre Corporation, seeking to recover franchise and excise taxes, together with interest and penalty thereon, which had been paid under protest. The issue presented is whether or not appellant was doing business during the tax years in question “in Tennessee and elsewhere” so as to entitle it to use the apportionment formula for excise and franchise taxes contained in T.C.A. §§ 67-2710 and 67-2916. Since appellant is neither a common carrier nor a manufacturer, apportionment is claimed on the basis of the proportion of gross…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John Ownbey Co. v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Signal Thread Company v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Roane Hosiery, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Nashville & Decatur Railroad v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. Gaines Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Howard Cotton Co. v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Broadmoor-Kingsport Apartments, Inc. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. H. D. Lessors, Inc. v. TidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Allenberg Exports, Inc. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API