Legal Opinion

Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1930No. Docket No. 6951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff, a minor girl of the age of about four years, was injured by being struck by one of the cars operated by the Market Street Railway Company. By her guardian ad litem she commenced this action to obtain a judgment for injuries sustained. She named the company, L. M. McClelland, the motorman, and W. J. Housel, the conductor, as defendants. The conductor’s motion for a nonsuit was granted. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon the other defendants have appealed.

The accident occurred between Broderick and Divisadero on Hayes Street…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Newell-Murdoch Realty Co. v. WickhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Lambert v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Elliott v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Beanes v. State Plumbing Supply Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API