Legal Opinion

Beanes v. State Plumbing Supply Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1936No. Civ. No. 11062Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, J., pro tem.

Jurors found in favor of defendants and against plaintiff in the latter’s action for damages for injuries suffered in an automobile accident. The court granted plaintiff’s motion for new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and defendants prosecute this appeal from such order.

Where there is conflicting evidence it is within the discretion of the trial court to grant a new trial; and if such conflict in the evidence appears it is not the province of an appellate tribunal to disturb the order so made. (Francis v. Pacific Elec. Ry.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Francis v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API