Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Motors Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1960No. 9939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of defendant.

The principal contention of plaintiff is that the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance of the trial. The record discloses that on October 17, 1957, the court set this case for trial by jury to be heard on November 14, 1957. On November 12, a stipulation signed by counsel for the respective parties was filed to the effect that the setting of the case for trial on November 14, may be vacated and the trial continued over the term and that the cause should thereafter be set down for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meredith v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rausch v. CozianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Beck v. PeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Light v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Dean v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bairas v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API