Legal Opinion

Bairas v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1962No. 9599PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

From a judgment of the lower court dismissing his complaint upon the merits and defendants’ counterclaim without prejudice, the plaintiff appeals. He contends that the court erred in denying his motions for a continuance and change of venue.

On July 5, 1960, the plaintiff and Philip G. Fulstow were the sole occupants of the latter’s automobile which ran off a highway in Coconino County, Arizona. Fulstow died as a result of the accident, and the plaintiff suffered a broken neck, causing him to be paralyzed from the neck down. Plaintiff was removed to a hospital in California…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sharp v. GianulakisUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lancino v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Westfall v. Motors InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. Master Protection Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. MILLER PONTIAC, INC. v. OsborneUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gentry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gentry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API