Light v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; W. P. Wade, Judge. Action by W. R. Light against E. -W. Richardson. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are presented in several bills of exceptions.
The cause was set for March 3, 1892, in the superior court, and was on the calendar for trial. The defendant’s attorneys were Messrs. Willis & Appel, and on that day Mr. Willis was absent from the county on business, and Mr. Appel was unable to be present on account of sickness. The defendant was present with his witnesses, and ready for trial but for the absence of his attorney. Another cause was then on trial, *746and, in answer to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Meredith v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Neil v. GaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Westfall v. Motors InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.