Legal Opinion

Rausch v. Cozian

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 28, 1929No. 12,183PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Grace Rausch, a minor, by her next friend sued James Cozian and Mary Cozian to recover damages received by being struck by defendants ’ automobile in December, 1924. She alleges that these injuries resulted in incurable valvular heart trouble and chronic appendicitis. On January 10, 1928, the case came on for trial before a jury. The plaintiff failed to appear and her counsel represented that she was too ill to attend court at that time: Testimony of various witnesses was taken as to her condition, whereby it developed that the plaintiff had chronic appendicitis and that an .operation had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elliott v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Fetta v. VandevierColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Seaton v. TohillColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Lane v. GoodingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. People ex rel. Porteus v. BartonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Reppin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Butler v. FarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API